At
the height of its popularity, Viz had a circulation of 1.2 million
just in Britain. That's eight times as much as the figure for
Spider-Man, the biggest seller in the US. Since then it has dropped
to a mere 50,750 in 2014. That puts it in the same league as "Batman
Eternal" and "Inhuman" and way above "New
Avengers", "Death of Wolverine Weapon X Program",
"Deadpool's Art of War", "Superior Iron Man",
"Teen Titans", "Hulk" and a whole bunch more.
In
2014, "Mad Magazine" had a monthly sales figure of 139,648
which actually makes it more popular than Spider-Man. In its hey-day
in the mid 70s, it was over 2 million copies a month. However, I
don't know if its creator-owned so it may not be relevant to this
discussion.
http://www.comichron.com/monthlycomicssales/2014/2014-11.html
What's
really interesting if you look at yearly sales, number 2 is "Walking
Dead", beating everyone but Spider-Man.
http://www.comichron.com/monthlycomicssales/2014.html
But,
to be fair, you have to go to position 80 before you find another
title that is not Marvel or DC (and it's the "Walking Dead"
again!) and most of that is super-heroes so your question does have a
fair point within it.
The
answer, as with films, comes down to marketing and promotion.
Marvel
and DC just spend more resources promoting their brands. The only one
who's come close is McFarlane and Spawn although he has pushed it a
lot less than he could've done. And, of course, that promotion builds
year on year.
The
additional problem with creator-owned comics is longevity. Take Dave
Sims and "Cerebus the Aardvark". It went from 1977 to 2004,
which is a hell of a time to continue a story. Eventually it imploded
over some really stupid controversies over Sims' alleged beliefs.
Prior to that was Robert Crumb's "Zap Comics" which started
in 1968 but petered out after the mid 70s with issues coming out with
3-5 year gaps between them until the final issue "Zap" 16
was finally published in 2014 by Fantagraphics, 9 years after the
previous issue. Because they are creator-owned, succession planning
is very difficult for them. Some of them just don't want their work
to continue without them.
This
is not just a problem with comics. It's a problem with many
activities A person sets up a brilliant little restaurant but because
no one considered passing it on, it closes when they retire.
However,
Stan Lee and Steve Ditko have long gone from Spider-Man but it just
keeps going on and on and on .... And the same is true with Batman
and Superman. However, they pay for this longevity with lack of
continuity. Take a look at the liberties different writers have taken
with the characters over the decades. Its amazing that they still
hold together as recognisable brands.
Credit: The header image
is available as wallpaper from wall.alphacoders.com
No comments:
Post a Comment