Tuesday, 17 May 2016

Soap Operas: How Did The Routine Use Of DNA Testing Change The Trope Of "Who is the biological father"?


This is an incredible tool that is just so under-used.
Imagine the scenario:
An 18 year old son suddenly collapses. At the hospital it is discovered that his kidneys are shutting down and he needs a transplant to save his life. The wife's in a wheelchair and can't help. The father immediately steps forward and offers one of his because he loves his son. However, during the routine tissue typing, they discover that he isn't the real father. It is revealed that 18 years and 9 months ago, the husband and wife had an enormous row and she stormed out. She went to a trucker's bar, got drunk and laid the first stranger she could find as "revenge" against her husband. The next morning, she awoke in a cheap hotel room all alone, realised that she had been stupid, went home and patched it up with her husband but never told him what happened because of her shame. She never even thought that she might have become pregnant from that night. Now, in order to save the "son" he loves, the husband has to track down a complete stranger from almost 20 years ago and persuade him to give up a kidney for a son he has never known. But the clock is ticking and time is running out for the son
Isn't that a storyline you'd like to see? What is the possible fall-out of that - the newly discovered father wants more access to the son afterwards; both the husband and the son have to deal with the wife's infidelity and their new relationship; what if the husband finds out that the story is a lie and that his wife has had a long list of infidelities before and since?
Imagine another scenario:
2 men argue over who is the father of a particular child. They do a paternity test and neither is the father. In fact, the child doesn't even belong to the mother. The child was accidentally swapped at the hospital and they've raised someone else's child.
Here's another:
This one actually happened: during a routine DNA test, it was discovered that the two children of a particular mother went related to her although they were related to the husband and the children were taken away. She had to go to court to get them back. Her defence team proved that the children were related to their maternal grandmother and so had to be related to their mother. It turned out that the mother was two twins who had fused back to become one baby. So her ovaries belonged to one twin and her saliva-producing cells to the other, thus the confusion.
The possibilities are endless.


Credit: The header image is available as wallpaper from Wall.AlphaCoders.com

No comments:

Post a Comment